ROYAL 
												DUTCH SHELL has been forced to 
												raise its spending by $4 billion 
												(£2.25 billion) next year to 
												cope with soaring oil industry 
												inflation, cost overruns on 
												difficult projects and a legacy 
												of ageing infrastructure. 
												The oil group yesterday 
												set out its investment plans for 
												2006, which envisage a capital 
												budget of $19 billion, up from 
												$15 billion in 2005, and higher 
												spending in almost every area of 
												its business. 
												
												Shell is raising the bar 
												after a difficult year in which 
												two landmark developments, the 
												Sakhalin liquefied natural gas 
												project in Russia, and the Bonga 
												deep-water offshore platform in 
												Nigeria suffered delays and 
												breached their budgets. 
												In June, Shell admitted 
												that Sakhalin’s total cost would 
												double to $20 billion and 
												yesterday Peter Voser, Shell’s 
												finance director, said that the 
												Russian gas project would absorb 
												$400 million more in 2006 than 
												will be spent this year. 
												
												The new spending plan is 
												heavily biased to Shell’s 
												upstream business, in which the 
												company is working hard to bring 
												more oil and gas into production 
												in order to raise its flat 
												production profile. The upstream 
												business will spend $15 billion, 
												including $2 billion on 
												exploration wells. Refining and 
												marketing will absorb the 
												remaining $4 billion of the $19 
												billion budget. 
												Jeroen van der Veer, 
												Shell’s chief executive, said 
												that two thirds of the upstream 
												spending would be devoted to 
												growth projects intended to turn 
												Shell’s dowry of 13 billion 
												barrels of hydrocarbons in the 
												ground into commercial reserves 
												of saleable oil and gas. “We 
												expect to bring 5 billion 
												barrels to final investment 
												decision by 2009,” he said. 
												
												By 2009, Shell expects to 
												lift daily oil and gas output to 
												between 3.8 million and 4 
												million barrels per day, from 
												current levels of between 3.2 
												million and 3.5 million bpd. 
												
												The remaining $4 billion 
												to $5 billion of upstream 
												spending will be targeted on 
												redevelopment of older fields, 
												such as the North Sea, and on 
												asset maintenance and the 
												integrity of offshore 
												facilities. 
												Shell and the other North 
												Sea operators, including 
												ExxonMobil, BP and Total, need 
												to renew infrastructure in the 
												North Sea, which, after three 
												decades of production, has 
												reached the end of its projected 
												life. Shell would not give 
												details of its spending in the 
												North Sea yesterday, but sources 
												close to the company indicate 
												that it has earmarked $1 billion 
												for asset renewal and integrity.
												
												Analysts said that the 
												figures were at the high end of 
												expectations, but were not 
												surprising given the investment 
												signal from the strong oil 
												price. “It underlines the 
												intensity of spending in the oil 
												industry and highlights the 
												curious nature of the UK 
												taxation increase announced last 
												week,” said Jon Rigby, of UBS, 
												referring to Gordon Brown’s 
												decision to raise the tax on oil 
												companies from 40 per cent to 50 
												per cent. “It’s a tax based on a 
												retrospective view of spending,” 
												he added.