| 
						
						Daily Telegraph: Shell urged to help pay investors' tax 
						bills: "Lord 
						Oxburgh of Liverpool, the former chairman of Shell, has 
						called on the oil and gas giant to compensate British 
						investors left with a multi-million pound tax bill from 
						its restructuring.": The vast majority of the 3,000 
						Royal Dutch holders accepted the deal after Jeroen van 
						der Veer, Shell's chief executive, warned his "toolbox" 
						to help them was empty. But a small minority held out 
						and were rewarded in late September when Shell offered a 
						tax-efficient loan note alternative. The shareholders 
						who originally accepted - and have been left with a 
						large tax bill - are now considering legal action 
						against Shell.": Monday 14 November 2005 By Christopher 
						Hope, Business Correspondent (Filed: 
						14/11/2005) Lord Oxburgh of Liverpool, the 
						former chairman of Shell, has called on the oil and gas 
						giant to compensate British investors left with a 
						multi-million pound tax bill from its restructuring. The peer, who stood down three 
						months ago, chaired the board of Shell Transport and 
						Trading when it merged with Royal Dutch Petroleum to 
						create Royal Dutch Shell, a £130billion oil and gas 
						giant.  However, it emerged that 3,000 UK 
						shareholders in Royal Dutch Petroleum, many of them 
						elderly, were left with a £77m capital gains tax bill on 
						their collective £192m from the change-over. Lord Oxburgh, 71, who stepped down 
						in July, told The Daily Telegraph: "I would feel much 
						better if a way could be found to compensate them for 
						the losses they have suffered. "Privately we had sympathy with them 
						and the letters that had to be written were quite formal 
						for that reason. "I would have liked to have taken 
						some of those old ladies and given them a big hug but we 
						were not allowed to do so." Shell's board had been 
						unaware of the extent of British holders in Royal Dutch 
						because many of the holdings were through anonymous 
						nominee accounts, he said. "The shareholders have to realise 
						that because they were investing in a Dutch company in 
						such a way that they were totally invisible as far as 
						the Royal Dutch board is concerned. Once the problem had 
						reached that point the company was on the road and in a 
						position that it would have been illegal to offer any 
						kind of financial advice to shareholders." The vast majority of the 3,000 Royal 
						Dutch holders accepted the deal after Jeroen van der 
						Veer, Shell's chief executive, warned his "toolbox" to 
						help them was empty. But a small minority held out and 
						were rewarded in late September when Shell offered a 
						tax-efficient loan note alternative. The shareholders 
						who originally accepted - and have been left with a 
						large tax bill - are now considering legal action 
						against Shell. The Association of Private Client 
						Investment Managers and Stockbrokers, which campaigned 
						for the shareholders and is holding a meeting for 
						British Royal Dutch holders today, welcomed the peer's 
						comments. A spokesman said: "Given Lord 
						Oxburgh's views on this matter, it is a great pity that 
						he was unable to act upon them whilst still in charge at 
						Shell. However, it is never too late for Shell to put 
						things right." A Shell spokesman said: "Royal Dutch 
						Shell does not believe that it is appropriate to provide 
						payments to some shareholders for individual tax 
						liabilities. In addition, UK shareholders who accepted 
						the Royal Dutch offer will have the tax base cost of 
						their investment reset, which may reduce or eliminate 
						the CGT arising on future disposals.  "On this basis, it would be 
						inequitable for Royal Dutch Shell to make payments to 
						any shareholder for their tax liability."  |