| 
			
				| 
					
						
							|  |  | 
								
								
								Published on : Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:05 
								 |  
							|  |  | 
								
								
								By: Amy Watts |  
  LONDON 
					- Oil giant Royal Dutch Shell has announced that it plans to 
					by out the remaining shares that it does not already own in 
					its Royal Dutch arm thereby taking the final steps towards 
					the unification of its UK and Dutch arms in July. 
 Currently, Royal Dutch Shell holds 98.5 percent of the 
					erstwhile Royal Dutch. After its merger with Britain's Shell 
					Transport and Trading in July, the firm said yesterday that 
					the remaining shareholders have the option of either taking 
					cash or equivalent new shares of the merged entity.
 
 Following the reserves overbooking scandal last year, Royal 
					Dutch Shell had opted to unify its UK and Dutch arms in a 
					bid to restore confidence in the company. The proposed 
					buyout of the remaining shares would be completed by merging 
					Royal Dutch with a holding subsidiary Shell Petroleum NV. 
					The company said that it expected to complete the buyout by 
					the end of this year. The final terms of the deal would only 
					be revealed in the fourth quarter of the year, Royal Dutch 
					Shell said.
 This announcement is great news to 
					around 400 UK investors who had refused to sell their shares 
					since they would have had to pay 40 percent capital gains 
					tax. But another 1,700 residents in the UK were not so lucky 
					as they had already sold their shares and paid the tax as 
					well. Angela Knight, chief executive of the Association of 
					Private Client Investment Managers and Stockbrokers (APCIMS) 
					said, "We are pleased with Shell's announcement. For the 
					refusniks who held on to their Royal Dutch shares there is 
					now something better on offer. There is no reason why Shell 
					could not have done this at the start and if they had, then 
					it could have saved a lot of heartache. It's a victory for 
					those who refused the offer because it would leave them with 
					a huge tax bill." 
 However, a Royal Dutch spokesman clarified that the company 
					could not have offered loan notes from the start itself, 
					"Because it was a share-for-share offer we could not have 
					offered loan notes from the start. That would not have been 
					consistent with the principles of the offer, which was a 
					complicated multi-jurisdictional issue."
 
 |  |