| Petroleum News: LNG terminal gets FERC go-ahead: 
								"Besides Woodside, the partners are subsidiaries 
								of BHP Billiton, BP, Chevron and Shell, plus 
								Japan Australia LNG (Mitsui and Mitsubishi).": 
								Saturday 24 December 2005 
								Cheniere milestones come as 
								Trinidad adds big new production train in tight 
								world market for low-polluting fuel Allen Baker Petroleum 
								News Contributing Writer Another LNG terminal on the Gulf Coast has 
								received all its permits for construction just 
								as the huge liquefied natural gas complex in 
								Trinidad added production capacity.  Cheniere Energy Inc. announced Dec. 16 it 
								has received authorization from the Federal 
								Energy Regulatory Commission to build a terminal 
								at Corpus Christi, Texas, with a capacity of 2.6 
								billion cubic feet daily.  The company said the same day that FERC 
								has issued a draft Environmental Impact 
								Statement for the Creole Trail LNG terminal (3.3 
								bcf per day) in Cameron Parish, La. And three 
								days later, the company building the Freeport 
								LNG terminal (1.75 bcf per day initial capacity) 
								in Texas announced it has closed a $383 million 
								private financing deal for that terminal, where 
								Cheniere has a 30 percent interest and 
								ConocoPhillips is a partner.  Aside from Freeport, in Texas, Cheniere 
								has also begun construction at its Sabine Pass 
								terminal in Louisiana, with a capacity of 2.6 
								billion cubic feet.  Plainly speaking, the LNG terminals being 
								built around the country could be sitting on 
								loads of excess capacity as other nations speak 
								for the world’s LNG supply. The five existing 
								U.S. terminals are running at about 50 percent 
								of their capacity, and new supplies around the 
								world are being locked up by gas-hungry 
								utilities signing contracts stretching out a 
								quarter of a century.  For example, Chevron Corp. has long-term 
								contracts for its 50 percent share of the 
								planned Gorgon project off Australia. Three 
								Japanese utilities recently agreed to 25-year 
								contracts for Chevron’s 5 million tonnes of LNG 
								annually, the equivalent of about 660 million 
								cubic feet daily.  The Japanese companies were clearly 
								willing to pay a premium for the gas, which had 
								been destined for China. That country’s CNOOC 
								backed out due to price issues.  Atlantic LNG at Trinidad and Tobago is the 
								closest and biggest LNG supplier for the North 
								American market. The startup of Train 4 on Dec. 
								16 boosted capacity there by more than 50 
								percent to 15 million tonnes per year.  That amounts to just under 2 bcf per day, 
								so even if it all went to the four Gulf Coast 
								receiving terminals where Cheniere is involved, 
								it would amount to just a fifth of their 
								capacity. That’s before planned Phase 2 
								expansions, competing terminals, and so on. 
								Filling those capital-intensive projects, which 
								cost around $600 million each, could be a 
								challenge.  New LNG supplies are being developed 
								around the world, from Nigeria to gas-rich Qatar 
								to Indonesia and Sakhalin Island. Billions of 
								dollars are going into gigantic chillers and 
								insulated tankers to carry the supercooled 
								liquid.  Australia’s Woodside Energy Ltd. just 
								announced plans to spend more than $1 billion on 
								developing the Angel field, with projected 
								output of 800 million cubic feet of gas and up 
								to 50,000 barrels of condensate daily. That will 
								feed the North West Shelf venture, which made a 
								$1.5 billion financing commitment last summer 
								for a fifth liquefaction train there, raising 
								capacity to 16.3 million tonnes annually, or 2.1 
								bcf a day.  The six equal partners in that project 
								were so bullish on the market they didn’t wait 
								for customer commitments. Besides Woodside, the 
								partners are subsidiaries of BHP Billiton, BP, 
								Chevron and Shell, plus Japan Australia LNG 
								(Mitsui and Mitsubishi).  Woodside is also pushing ahead with its 
								fully owned Pluto project, where Tokyo Gas Co. 
								recently made a 20-year commitment.  Most U.S. LNG terminals are being financed 
								with long-term commitments for capacity from 
								major multinationals. At the Freeport project, 
								for example ConocoPhillips has bought a billion 
								cubic feet of daily capacity, which could come 
								from Qatar, Venezuela, or other sources. Dow 
								Chemical Co. has spoken for half a billion cubic 
								feet at Freeport. For a planned Phase 2, a 
								consortium of ConocoPhillips and Mitsubishi has 
								long-term contracts for half a billion cubic 
								feet.  For now, supply is tight and spot market 
								cargoes are rare. With growing demand from 
								Europe and Asia, it may take a long time for a 
								competitive spot market for LNG to develop. In 
								North America, finding adequate supply could be 
								a major issue in the next few decades. The 
								Energy Information Administration figures U.S. 
								consumption will rise by 20 percent by 2025, 
								while supplies from domestic wells are expected 
								to rise by only 10 percent. |