By Alfred Donovan (All of the underlining below is 
							mine…) 
							
							THE HYPE & SPIN
							
							
							THE RIGHTS OF NOBEL LAUREATE *KEN SARO-WIWA 
							TO FREELY HOLD AND AIR HIS VIEWS (ABOUT SHELL):
							
							
							EXTRACTS FROM Shell.com website: 
							
							“We did, however, speak out both publicly and 
							privately about human rights issues on a number of 
							occasions. For instance, during the trial of Ken 
							Saro-Wiwa and eight other Ogonis, we publicly stated 
							that the accused had a right to a fair legal 
							process. Before the trial, we said Ken Saro-Wiwa 
							had a right to freely hold and air his views.”
							
							
							THE RIGHTS OF ALFRED DONOVAN TO EXPRESS HIS 
							OPINIONS (ABOUT SHELL) 
							
							FROM SHELL INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM COMPANY LIMITED 
							LEGAL SUBMISSION TO THE WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 
							ORGANISATION REGARDING THE WEBSITE OF ALFRED 
							DONOVAN: 18 MAY 2005 
							
							"The Complainant and the Group it 
							represents have been aware of the site since the 
							beginning and whilst they would not endorse or agree 
							with many of the comments made by the Respondent on 
							the website, they have taken the view that the 
							Respondent is entitled to express his opinions and 
							to use the Internet as a medium for doing so."
							
							
							SHELL’S SUPPORT FOR THE UN UNIVERSAL 
							DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (FROM THE SHELL DOCUMENT 
							- BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS: A MANAGEMENT PRIMER: © 
							Shell International Petroleum Company (SIPC) 1998)
							
							
							“We have also lent our support to international 
							declarations and standards that were developed to 
							foster human rights, including the UN’s Universal 
							Declaration of Human Rights…” 
							
							3.12. So what does all this mean for Shell companies 
							and the individuals within those companies? 
							
							The Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies supports 
							the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other 
							international human rights standards. 
							
							(The document republishes the entire text of The 
							United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights 
							or UDHR - reproduced in full on pages 27-31) 
							
							Article 19 
							
							“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and 
							expression; this right 
							includes freedom to hold opinions without 
							interference and to seek, receive 
							and impart information and ideas through any media 
							and regardless of 
							frontiers.” 
							
							2.1 What Are Human Rights? 
							
							The key document providing an answer to this 
							question is the Universal 
							Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The UDHR 
							consists of a preamble 
							and thirty articles, which list both “civil and 
							political rights” (such as the 
							right to a fair trial, freedom from torture, 
							freedom of conscience… 
							
							ENTRACTS FROM SHELL DOCUMENTS ENDS 
							
							THE REALITY i.e. WHAT SHELL 
							MANAGEMENT DOES AS OPPOSED TO WHAT IT SAYS
							
							
							EIGHT Royal Dutch Shell companies collectively 
							obtained a HIGH COURT INJUNCTION and RESTRAINING 
							ORDER against a former employee, Dr John Huong, a 
							Malaysian who, driven by his conscience, blew 
							the whistle on Shell management misdeeds including 
							the fabrication of hydrocarbon reserves and health 
							and safely issues which put Shell employee lives at 
							risk. The sole purpose of the draconian litigation 
							against this unemployed Malaysian, who was 
							sidelined, humiliated and ultimately sacked for 
							speaking the truth, was to prevent him exercising 
							HIS RIGHTS to freedom of conscience and freedom 
							of expression following his wrongful dismissal.
							
							
							We also have evidence that Shell has succeeded in 
							using the action against Dr Huong to frighten former 
							Shell Malaysian employees from speaking out against 
							the injustices heaped upon them by Shell. Several 
							hundred of them, many elderly, sick, and dying, 
							recently won a retirement funds case against Shell 
							when a Judge ruled that Shell had acted “unlawfully” 
							in making inappropriate deductions. Shell is however 
							ruthlessly dragging out the case by appealing the 
							judgment based on a legal loophole relating to time 
							limits. 
							
							In June 2005 Shell had five Irishman - now known as 
							the "Rossport Five", jailed for 3 months for 
							engaging in an entirely peaceful campaign against 
							the Corrib pipeline project on entirely valid health 
							and safety grounds. They were released after 
							thousands of Irish people engaged in street protests 
							in response to such oppressive behaviour by an 
							arrogant multinational giant whose actions are 
							dictated by a bungling management drunk on power and 
							corrupted by greed. 
							
							This scandal ridden company has a reputation for 
							incompetence, misjudgement and dishonesty (and as 
							indicated above) blatant ruthlessness towards some 
							Shell employees. Led by a CEO, Jeroen van der Veer, 
							himself facing fraud allegations in the US courts, 
							Shell has recently demonstrated breathtaking 
							arrogance by indulging itself in a fleet of luxury 
							jets. This is at a time when according to The Sunday 
							Times, other multinationals are getting rid of their 
							executive planes. It seems that the rights of some 
							Shell employees - its ego driven bosses - are more 
							important than others. 
							
							Thus the reality of Shell management actions 
							is totally at odds with their Spin & Hype. 
							
							
							* Ken Saro-Wiwa was hanged by the evil Nigerian 
							military regime which was closely associated with 
							Shell at that time. Sir Philip Watts is being sued 
							in connection with allegations that while head of 
							Shell in Nigeria he personally helped to create and 
							arm a 1400 strong private spy force. Furthermore, 
							Shell has admitted that an undercover agent working 
							for them carried out operations in Nigeria. His 
							cover story involved making a film in Nigeria called 
							“Business as Usual: the Arrogance of Power”, during 
							which he interviewed friends of Ken Saro-Wiwa. 
							Shell’s spy, German-born Manfred Schlickenrieder, 
							engaged in espionage missions involving deception, 
							sabotage, betrayal and intelligence gathering. 
							Schlickenrieder was known by the code name Camus and 
							had worked for the German foreign intelligence 
							service gathering information about terrorist 
							groups, including the Red Army Faction. 
							
							How such activities are compatible with Shell’s 
							supposed commitment to ethical trading, human rights 
							and its STATEMENT OF GENERAL BUSINESS PRINCIPLES is 
							beyond my comprehension. The right of Ken Saro-Wiwa 
							to the most basic human right of all - the right to 
							live - was taken away from him in the most terrible 
							circumstances. We wonder if anyone at Shell 
							management has a conscience about what happened to 
							this courageous Nigerian who always insisted on 
							peaceful campaigning against Shell's activities? His 
							voice might have been useful in the Nigerian Delta 
							these days. 
						| Royal Dutch Shell Group ShellNews.net: ROYAL DUTCH SHELL SUPPORT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & FREEDOM OF SPEECH: PR HYPE & SPIN VS. REALITY: Mon 06 Feb 2006 | 
 |