IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT 
KUALA LUMPUR
(CIVIL DIVISION) CIVIL SUIT NO. 
S2 - 23 - 38 - 2006
 
BETWEEN
 
1.         SARAWAK SHELL BHD 
(71978-W)
2.        
SHELL MALAYSIA TRADING 
SENDIRIAN BERHAD (6078-M)
3.         SHELL REFINING COMPANY 
(FEDERATION OF MALAYA) BHD (3926-U)
4.         SHELL TIMUR SDN BHD 
(113304-H)
5.         SHELL EXPLORATION AND 
PRODUCTION MALAYSIA B.V. (993963-V)
6.         SHELL OIL AND GAS 
(MALAYSIA) LLC (993830-X)
7.         SHELL SABAH SELATAN 
SDN BHD (228504-T)
8.         SABAH SHELL PETROLEUM 
COMPANY LTD (993229-W)                            
... PLAINTIFFS
 
AND
 
HUONG YIU TUONG                                                                                                               
... DEFENDANT
 
AFFIDAVIT
 
I, 
THAVAKUMAR KANDIAH PILLAI (NRIC NO. 8299631), care of Bangunan Shell Malaysia, 
Changkat Semantan, 50490 Kuala Lumpur, a Malaysian citizen of full age, do 
solemnly and sincerely affirm and say as follows:
 
	- 
	I am the Legal Manager 
	of the Plaintiffs and I am authorised to make this affidavit on behalf of 
	the Plaintiffs.
 
	- 
	I make this affidavit 
	from personal knowledge and from documents I have seen.
 
	- 
	I make this affidavit in 
	support of the Plaintiffs' application under Order 38 Rule 2 of the Rules of 
	the High Court for leave to cross-examine Alfred Ernest Donovan as a 
	precondition to his affidavit of 19.5.06 being used in the hearing of the 
	Plaintiffs application to cite the Defendant for contempt.
 
	- 
	This affidavit 
	supplements my previous affidavit of 5.4.06 in support of the Plaintiffs' 
	Application for interim injunctive relief.
 
	- 
	The grounds of this 
	application are these:
 
	- 
	Between April and May 
	2004, the Defendant circulated various emails which were defamatory of the 
	Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs commenced proceedings against the Defendant for 
	them in Kuala Lumpur High Court Civil Suit Mo. 52-23-41- 2004 (the first 
	action).
 
	- 
	On 24.6.04  the High 
	Court made an Order in the first action against the Defendant, in this 
	action, on inter alia the following terms:
 
            "The 
Defendant, by himself, his servants or agents or otherwise howsoever, be 
restrained from publishing or causing lo be published on the internet website 
"Shell Whistleblower No. 2" any statements, articles, correspondence and any 
other publications whatsoever, concerning the Plaintiffs' and/or "Shell 
Management" and/or the Plaintiffs' Management Officers and/or the Plaintiffs' 
servants or agents alleging that they or each or them are liars, cheats, 
dishonest, corrupted and practised deception and conspiracy, criminal conduct 
and were generally evil, and/or statements to similar effect, pending the trial 
of this action or further order.
 
           The Defendant, by 
himself his servants or agents or otherwise howsoever, be restrained from 
publishing or causing to be published any 
article, material 
correspondence, circulars in any form whatsoever containing allegations that the 
Plaintiffs and/or "Shell Malaysia" and/or the Plaintiffs' servants or agents are 
liars, cheats, dishonest, corrupted and practised deception and conspiracy, 
criminal conduct and were generally evil, and/or statements to similar effect, 
pending the trial of this action or further order".
 
	- 
	The   Plaintiffs' 
	contend that the Defendant has disobeyed the Order by publishing or causing 
	to be published further defamatory statements. Contempt proceedings have 
	been commenced against him for this.
 
	- 
	Without prejudice to the 
	Plaintiffs rights in the first action, the Defendant made further defamatory 
	publications against the Plaintiffs. These are the subject matter of the 
	present action.
 
	- 
	The Plaintiffs applied 
	herein for interim injunctive relief.  The grounds are set out in detail in 
	my previous affidavit.
 
    Subsequent conduct
 
	- 
	After this application 
	was filed and before it was heard, the Defendant made further defamatory 
	publications of and concerning the Plaintiffs.  All were published on 
	the Shellnews.net which Donovan owns and controls.
 
	- 
	Donovan thereafter made
	4 postings on his Shellnews.net website on the Notice to Show Cause 
	served by the Plaintiffs on the Defendant in the first action. The 
	publication of these comments themselves constitutes contempt of court as 
	they comment on the merits of the contempt proceedings against the 
	Defendant.
 
	- 
	In particular, the 
	postings include an allegation that a Malaysian judge, when hearing a matter 
	commenced by a 'Shell' company, ruled in Shell's favour because of 
	inducement by Shell. The juxtaposition of these otherwise irrelevant remarks 
	into the comments on the Notice to Show Cause in this action, amounts to an 
	assertion that the Malaysian courts have ruled against the Defendant because 
	they have been influenced by the Plaintiffs.
 
	- 
	Donovan expressly states 
	that more postings will be made. These too will be as the Defendant's 
	servant and /or agent.  Copies of these 4 postings are annexed hereto and 
	marked as Exhibit "TK-5".
 
	- 
	These form the basis of 
	contempt proceedings in the first action. They however show Donovan's 
	involvement.
 
	- 
	The Plaintiffs contend 
	that, from the above, the Defendant has published and has manifested a clear 
	intention of continuing to publish defamatory statements.  In this he is 
	aided and abetted by Donovan. Donovan admits as much.
 
	- 
	The Defendant filed 2 
	affidavits to oppose the Plaintiffs' application for interim injunctive 
	relief. The first was by the Defendant, and the second by Donovan.
 
    Donovan's affidavit 
of 19.5.06
 
	- 
	Donovan's stated 
	position is that all the publications that form the subject of this matter 
	were by him and/or in conjunction with his son.  He contends that they were 
	done independently, and not in any way on behalf of the Defendant.
 
	- 
	The Plaintiffs deny this 
	conclusion. Their position is that the postings were done at the behest of 
	the Defendant and therefore on his behalf. Even if they were not, they were 
	published by Donovan with the Defendant's knowledge that such publication 
	was certain. The Defendant is therefore responsible for the publications.
 
	- 
	The Plaintiffs do not 
	believe the bare assertions made by Donovan in his affidavit. In addition, 
	the Plaintiffs contend that the effect of Donovan's affidavit is that he 
	admits, aiding and abetting the Defendant in breaching the Injunction Order 
	in the first action. At the very least, Donovan impeded or interfered with 
	the administration of justice by ensuring that the Defendant breaches that 
	Injunction Order.
 
	- 
	Donovan continues to 
	impede or interfere with the administration of justice. He has published his 
	own latest affidavit on his website at
	
	http://shellnews.net/2006affidavit/shellnewsnetaedaffidavitmay2006.htm. 
	A copy of this posting is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit "TK-6".
 
	- 
	Donovan is outwardly 
	contemptuous of this Honourable Court. His latest posting contains a 
	hyperlink entitled:
 
      Click here to ACCESS 
THE DR HUONG ARTICLES PROHIBITED BY THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA ORDER (English) (Do 
not access the Dr Huong articles immediately above if you are located within the 
legal jurisdiction of the High Court of Malay)
 
	- 
	If Donovan accepts sole 
	responsibility for the publications, he should submit to Malaysian 
	jurisdiction and submit to cross-examination. The Plaintiffs therefore would 
	like to cross-examine Donovan as a precondition to his affidavit being used. 
	This Honourable Court can then satisfy itself as to whether the statements 
	made by Donovan are in fact true.
 
	- 
	The Plaintiffs therefore 
	pray for leave to cross-examine Donovan as a precondition to his affidavit 
	being used.
 
 
To an Affidavit by the 
deponent named          )
THAVAKUMAR KANDIAH PILLAI )
affirmed on this      
day of June, 2006              
)
at Kuala Lumpur 21 June 
2006                         
)
 
      
                                                Before Me 
 
      
                                                COMMISSIONER FOR OATHS
 
This Affidavit is filed by 
Messrs T H Liew & Partners, solicitors for the Plaintiffs abovenamed and whose 
address for service is at 4-02, 4th Floor, Straits Trading Building, 2, Lebuh 
Pasar Besar, 50050 Kuala Lumpur.
 
Tel  :   03 2612 9000
Fax  :   03 2612 9001
Ref  :   LTH/SARAWAKSHELL/00599-06
 
LEGAL DOCUMENT ENDS
Click here to return 
to www.royaldutchshellplc.com
Click here to return to Royal Dutch Shell Group .com