TheDay.com (Connecticut):
Blumenthal Challenges LNG Project: "Broadwater,
a partnership of Shell Oil and
TransCanada Corp., expects to file
its formal application by the end of
this month. ": 12 January 2006
Keeping gas barge details secret
sends up red flag, AG contends
|
|
Attorney
General
Richard
Blumenthal |
|
|
“We
don't do
business
that way. We
don't
censure what
we can tell
the public.”
State
Attorney
General
Richard
Blumenthal
|
|
|
|
“We
do try to
get
information
to those who
need to see
it. We are
not
withholding
anything.”
Tamara
Young-Allen,
spokeswoman
for FERC
|
|
|
|
By
JUDY BENSON
Health/Science/Environment Reporter
Published
on 1/12/2006
Hartford — If documents
describing the engineering and
design of a huge liquefied natural
gas barge proposed for Long Island
Sound must be kept secret to prevent
a terrorist attack, the project must
be inherently dangerous and should
be rejected, state Attorney General
Richard Blumenthal said Wednesday.
During a news conference,
Blumenthal announced he is
challenging a decision by federal
regulators to withhold from the
general public an engineering and
design report for the Broadwater
Energy LNG terminal. At Broadwater's
request, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission agreed to
restrict access to the documents
under Critical Energy Infrastructure
Information rules, developed as part
of Homeland Security measures
adopted by the federal government
after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks.
“Secrecy will not disarm
terrorists,” Blumenthal said. “It
will only disadvantage the public.
It will not guarantee safety and
security. It will disable efforts to
accurately and accountably evaluate
the risks. Secrecy spawns distrust.
Concealment signals danger.”
Joining Blumenthal in
announcing his challenge to FERC
were state Sens. Leonard Fasano,
R-North Haven, and Andrea Stillman,
D-Waterford. They also criticized
FERC's decision to limit access to
information about Broadwater's plan
to park an LNG barge in the middle
of the Sound. Fasano and Stillman
are co-chairmen of a state task
force evaluating the proposal.
Without the engineering and design
information, they said, they cannot
conduct a complete analysis.
“Broadwater has told us this
is not a likely terrorist target,”
Fasano said. “But if this
(disclosure of the documents) is an
issue of security, that puts the
issue of terrorism back into play.
You can't have it both ways.”
He added that detailed
information about the engineering
and design of the terminal, such as
whether seawater would be used to
warm the super-chilled liquid gas
into a vapor and how storm water
would be treated, is essential for
the task force to be able to
determine potential environmental
impacts on the sound.
Blumenthal's challenge is
similar to one filed last month by
attorneys for Suffolk County, L.I.,
which includes the communities that
would be closest to the LNG
terminal. It would be located in New
York waters of Long Island Sound,
about nine miles north of Riverhead,
N.Y., and 11 miles south of
Branford.
Connecticut officials,
including Gov. M. Jodi Rell, believe
their views should be considered in
FERC's review because the terminal
and the tankers that will supply it
could impact boating, fishing and
environmental conditions on the
entire waterway.
FERC has not yet made a
decision on Suffolk County's
challenge, according to Tamara
Young-Allen, spokeswoman for the
agency. FERC has been receiving
reports and other information from
Broadwater in preparation for
Broadwater's submission of a formal
application for the necessary
permits from the agency. While many
of those documents are available to
the public on FERC's Web site, at
the company's request some are not.
Broadwater, a partnership of
Shell Oil and TransCanada Corp.,
expects to file its formal
application by the end of this
month. Company officials say the
terminal would hold up to 8 billion
cubic feet of gas and add it would
add 1 billion cubic feet of natural
gas daily to existing pipelines,
with three-quarters of it going to
New York and the rest to
Connecticut. Liquefied natural gas
to supply the terminals would come
on refrigeration tankers filled at
overseas wells.
Young-Allen said documents are
classified as Critical Energy
Infrastructure Information, or CEII,
when they contain sensitive material
about specific locations or diagrams
of energy equipment that could be
misused in the wrong hands. The
rules were developed after the Sept.
11 terrorist attacks, she said, to
protect the country's utilities from
becoming targets. Sensitive
information about nuclear power
plants and compression sites along
gas pipelines, for example, is
routinely deemed CEII.
Young-Allen emphasized that
unlike other agencies that use CEII,
FERC offers an alternative means for
people to gain access to the
information. Those who can
demonstrate a need to know can make
a formal request to FERC. In the
case of a request that was granted,
the applicant would be required to
sign an agreement stating that he
would not talk about the CEII
information with anyone who didn't
also have access to it. He could
submit correspondence to FERC about
the information as long as it alerts
FERC that CEII information is
included, Young-Allen said.
“This is a unique request,”
she said of the challenge from
Suffolk County and Blumenthal. “We
do try to get information to those
who need to see it. We are not
withholding anything.”
Blumenthal said the mechanism
available for gaining access to the
engineering and design report from
Broadwater is not adequate because
it would severely restrict public
comment about it.
“We don't do business that
way,” he said, adding that he
refuses to be muzzled. “We don't
censure what we can tell the
public.”
Secrecy is only justified, he
said, in cases of “very exceptional
national security interest involving
potential loss of life.” If that is
the case with Broadwater's
documents, the project shouldn't be
built in Long Island Sound, a busy
shipping and boating corridor
surrounded by populated areas,
Blumenthal said.
John Hritcko Jr., senior vice
president of Broadwater, said his
company has simply followed federal
procedures and that the claim that
keeping the documents secret signals
that the project poses a danger is
flawed. Even some information about
wastewater treatment plants falls
under CEII regulations, he said.
“Does that make them less
safe? Absolutely not. It ensures
they remain safe.”
The situation, he said, is
comparable to a home with an
electronic security system. Having
such a system doesn't necessarily
mean the home is in danger. But, he
said, the homeowner wouldn't give
out the security code
indiscriminately.
“What they're asking us for
here is our pass code,” Hritcko
said.
At FERC, officials
characterized Blumenthal's
announcement as part of a pattern
that could hurt Connecticut's future
energy supply.
“He's opposed every energy
infrastructure project that's come
down the pike,” said spokesman Bryan
Lee, referring to Blumenthal's
objections to a gas pipeline and an
electrical cable across the sound.
“The commission is very concerned
that Connecticut is on the verge of
becoming the next California. The
state must develop the
infrastructure — power plants,
pipelines and new natural gas
supplies.”
He continued: “This is not
about keeping information secret.
This is information that's sensitive
that could do damage to the U.S.
infrastructure if it should fall
into the wrong hands.”
www.ferc.gov;
www.broadwaterenergy.com;
www.ctlng.state.ct.us/
Click here to return to
ShellNews.net HOME PAGE |